|
|
 |
THE GREENS/EFA IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
PRESS RELEASE - Brussels, 13 September 2005
Toxicity tests stripped from REACH proposal:
Pro-industry MEPs vote to cripple chemicals laws
A coalition of pro-industry MEPs from the European
Parliament's three main political groups today
managed to convince a strong majority of the
Parliament's industry committee to cripple a
proposed new chemicals law. The new legislation is
urgently
needed to protect human health and the environment
so as to reduce risk of cancer, birth defects and
environmental damage. Members of the socialist,
conservative and liberal groups voted to reduce data
requirements for chemical substances across the
board and weakened the provisions for authorisation
of substances of the highest concern, effectively
eliminating or weakening key pillars of the
Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of
CHemicals (REACH) legislation. The committee was
voting on its opinion on the regulation.
Reacting to the vote Satu Hassi, Finnish
Green member of the committee, said:
"I am shocked to see how the majority of the
Industry Committee could ignore the need to protect
human health and instead to follow the line of the 'cancer
lobby'. It is no surprise that the German
conservative Werner Langen and socialist Erika Mann
exclusively pushed the industry line, but it is
shocking to see Mann's
socialist colleagues following her line - which runs
contrary to her group's overall position."
"The fundamental principle of 'no data, no market'
has become 'no data, no worries.' For 20,000
substances that fall under REACH, industry will only
have to provide the information they currently have
- rewarding those who have behaved irresponsibly in
the past and failed to test the chemicals they sell.
Eight important tests have been eliminated on purely
economic grounds for another 5,000 substances,
leaving workers and consumers potentially
unprotected against substances that could be
mutagenic or toxic to reproduction. And for the
little testing that remains, industry can ask for
wide-ranging waivers. The chemicals industry can be
proud of their loyal MEPs for effectively
demolishing testing requirements."
"If the opinion of the Industry committee was the
final result, REACH would be reduced to a chaotic
and reduced 'à la carte' system instead of
specifying clear legal requirements. Most companies
that buy from manufacturers to produce consumer
articles would continue to be ignorant about the
risk of the chemicals they are using and how to
protect their workers and clients."
"The committee went on to attack the scope of the
regulation, voted to give 'carte blanche' to
research and development without any controls, and
to reduce the scope of substances that fall under
authorisation. And the combination of completely
overloading the agency with extra tasks and at the
same time cutting its funding
seems like a cynical recipe for disaster. I only
hope that the socialist group will continue to
support the very different and balanced approach
that their rapporteur takes in the environment
committee. I also hope that the liberal group will
reflect
on its position and take seriously the need to
improve health protection for workers and consumers
and protect the environment."
|
 |
 |
|
|